Aggressive Growth
View vault on Hyperliquid | Inception: March 15, 2026
Overview
Same systematic engine as Conservative Growth, deployed at 2x leverage. Larger positions, more positions per cluster, higher drawdown tolerance. The signals are identical — the difference is how aggressively we act on them. Not for the faint-hearted.
The Aggressive Growth fund uses the identical signal engine as the Conservative fund. The difference is sizing: higher leverage, larger maximum positions, and more positions per correlation cluster.
Backtest Performance
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.49 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.53 |
| CAGR | 345% |
| Max Drawdown | 30.3% |
| Win Rate | 54.6% |
Backtest period: Feb 2025 - Mar 2026. Stitched Binance + Hyperliquid data. Cost model: 3.4 bps effective. Strategy parameters and performance metrics are subject to change as the system evolves.
Strategy
Identical to Conservative Growth:
- Multiple signal families combined via machine learning
- Hourly rebalancing with 24-hour trade locks
- Correlation clustering and graduated drawdown scaling
- Setup-based entry gating
The only differences are in the risk parameters below.
Risk Controls
| Control | Setting |
|---|---|
| Leverage | 2x |
| Max single position | 25% of equity |
| Max long position | 30% of equity |
| Max short position | 15% of equity |
| Net exposure cap | 60% of gross |
| Max positions | 8 simultaneous |
| Circuit breaker | Close-only at 40% drawdown |
| Max per cluster | 5 |
Parameters
| Parameter | Value | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Fractional Kelly | 1.0 | Full Kelly with MCF caps |
| Deploy % | 75% | Same as conservative |
| Rebalance | Every 24 hours | Lower turnover at higher leverage |
| Correlation threshold | 0.70 | Same clustering |
| Max per cluster | 5 | More positions per group than conservative |